Contents
Invitations
Open Sourcing Future History Scripts around the world - eg SPACE RACE by Club of Bethesda, MD
How do these visions translate back into open curriculum Q&A that get 9 to 13s started on SciHi
What's the minimum any school would need so its 9 to 13s could network around SciHi and across to peers of their age whereever science is as heroic as a nation's famous sportswomen and sportsmen
Here is an example of some invitation threads. Could you pluck a few and start a parent's conversation ear you. It may also begin to illustrating why the above content sections atre emerging, but tell me if I am missing a section that would make you stand up and open space for science and children's futures.
Will you could co-edit an invitation and help mail out to any community where parents are eager to collaborate in mapping the who's who of scihi
Can Schhi learn from transparent (safe open free to speaK up and connect across cultures) histories of economic and social revolutions, as well as what inspires the silent majority of people to stop lurking, stand up and collaborate in insiprational change?
examples of practising revolution which we need to learn the safe bits from since networs are the greatest revolution to have ever hit one single generation -roughly those decision-makes and communalisers of how the globe spins around the humanity of 1984-2024:
EUROPE's 4 Great Lessons tracing back to the 19th Century Empire dichotomy of Kings and Kingless
1 "Peneurs" french origin "taking back" applied to "revolution" of the people taking back land that was being unproductively used by royalty.
2 One of the seminal surveys of entrepeneurs "Entrepreneurial Revolution" marks its 30th birthday in 2006. It is inviting revolutionaries of the net such as the emerging web2.1 movement emering out of California to co-publish one-page scripts on their systemic transformations.
3 Future historians can find The Economist's ER survey was at the crossroads of many compound visions including:
the extraordinary social revolution goals that the founder of The Economist set and expected all economics journalists to honour, out of London, then emerging as the 19th Century's epicente of world empower and now as then largest kingdom nation. A system which only multiplies extra value around the global villages of the empire (Commonwealth) if the king's leadership transpatrently waves trust around every culture and community in ways that politicians or businessmen or religions and other cause leaders alone cannot.
4 Italy's future history visions in the 1970s hubbing round such patrons of entrepreneurial spirit as a then youthful Romano Prodi, who believed in the EU's foundation identity of make every place peaceful particularly becasue he thought that an Italy connecting through Europe would compound a better future than an Italy isolated by mafia barons. Economists only ever supported the idea of the EU if it desined open market policies around compounding world where nations do not cause evil unto each other's people. Long ago the EU's over arcing systems in Brussels turned away from its founder's missions and transparent obligations to the 25 countyries peoples who won it and the interactions with the world that policies like agriculture wave wealth or poverty depending on which farmers livelihoods you truly seek to sustain in a world where food's markets know no boundaries whatever politicians of a Canutian mentality believe. Nobody who is serious about practising Entrepreneurs' rights is likely to find any useful texts sponsored by EU research unless you can provide us with the bookmarks which we'll happily catalogue here: ...
BEYOND EUROPE
There are worlds of entrepreneurial opportunities, and what networks do is multiply their connections with ever greater speed. As web2.1 folk people spiralling out of California say: we ain't seen nothing yet. And if as parents we have little idea what the web can do other thah it will link many revolutions, how can we help our children given the only racing certainty that their wealth and happiness will be a web revolution away from the separations that the pre-web 20th Century powered over.
America led the scihi way (better than all the peoples of the earth could possibly have expecetd) right up to Intrapreneurial charters of the early 1980s, as it had up to that time with progessing science for humanity. Clearly something to do with the transparency of scientific learning and application started changing around that time, otherwise today's urgent appeal by clusters of Americans to love scihi again would not be propagating across the states with such urgency from west to east and south to north. Exploratory Americans may now find huge science entrepreneur learnings to gather from collaborating with Canada, itself a great gateway to India and Australia, whose community-up preneurship provides the greatest basis bouth sustainbiluity of science and sustainability of economics. Meanwhile China is a global puzzle in itself. Clearly its spirit is indomitable Is this because fashionable female citizens want scientist husbands more than any other charcteristic? Or is it because the expatriate Chinese are the 3rd richest cultural group on earth and very scientific in what they will actually invest in?. Or...?
How can the 80% of people who are not Chinese encourage the best of scientific revolutions whilst opening this up to all beings not a class of haves science and a class of have nots? Why would those who control China's investments not want to curb continent-wide use of google as the tool that enables more science to be explored than interacted than any yet known to me?
5 Which are the biggest revolutions inspiring peoples that computers have changed the world with. Do you have a shortlist? Do you know what crises of humanity mathematicians like Einstein and John von Neumann computing to be epicentral to? And how do the greeatest missin controls of humanity's future history depend on the immensity of inspiration and trust in governance of where these missions will lead their emerging industry sectors to globalise the greatest opportunities with the smallest risks. exponentials
For example, the race to get to the moon -how did KM work in that revolution. Peter Drucker expected many revolutions. Last Tuesday President Bush promised American children 2 revolutions: what us parents call scihi getting kids excidted about their futures and learning science; making the first 5 year revolution an end to society's addiction to being driven by petroleum economics. If anyone is working on the entrepreneurial newtorks needed in these areas- please cintact me:as a peoples entrepreneur, I am simply connecting people who are passionate about compiling an open catalogue of who's who. To begin with I have sent a letter asking each of the 20 US business leaders behind the President's revolutionary promises what web2.1 type contactivities they already know of linking in these 2 great colaborative invitations. Is Europe doing anything similar?
Invitations
Open Sourcing Future History Scripts around the world - eg SPACE RACE by Club of Bethesda, MD
How do these visions translate back into open curriculum Q&A that get 9 to 13s started on SciHi
What's the minimum any school would need so its 9 to 13s could network around SciHi and across to peers of their age whereever science is as heroic as a nation's famous sportswomen and sportsmen
Here is an example of some invitation threads. Could you pluck a few and start a parent's conversation ear you. It may also begin to illustrating why the above content sections atre emerging, but tell me if I am missing a section that would make you stand up and open space for science and children's futures.
Will you could co-edit an invitation and help mail out to any community where parents are eager to collaborate in mapping the who's who of scihi
Can Schhi learn from transparent (safe open free to speaK up and connect across cultures) histories of economic and social revolutions, as well as what inspires the silent majority of people to stop lurking, stand up and collaborate in insiprational change?
examples of practising revolution which we need to learn the safe bits from since networs are the greatest revolution to have ever hit one single generation -roughly those decision-makes and communalisers of how the globe spins around the humanity of 1984-2024:
EUROPE's 4 Great Lessons tracing back to the 19th Century Empire dichotomy of Kings and Kingless
1 "Peneurs" french origin "taking back" applied to "revolution" of the people taking back land that was being unproductively used by royalty.
2 One of the seminal surveys of entrepeneurs "Entrepreneurial Revolution" marks its 30th birthday in 2006. It is inviting revolutionaries of the net such as the emerging web2.1 movement emering out of California to co-publish one-page scripts on their systemic transformations.
3 Future historians can find The Economist's ER survey was at the crossroads of many compound visions including:
the extraordinary social revolution goals that the founder of The Economist set and expected all economics journalists to honour, out of London, then emerging as the 19th Century's epicente of world empower and now as then largest kingdom nation. A system which only multiplies extra value around the global villages of the empire (Commonwealth) if the king's leadership transpatrently waves trust around every culture and community in ways that politicians or businessmen or religions and other cause leaders alone cannot.
4 Italy's future history visions in the 1970s hubbing round such patrons of entrepreneurial spirit as a then youthful Romano Prodi, who believed in the EU's foundation identity of make every place peaceful particularly becasue he thought that an Italy connecting through Europe would compound a better future than an Italy isolated by mafia barons. Economists only ever supported the idea of the EU if it desined open market policies around compounding world where nations do not cause evil unto each other's people. Long ago the EU's over arcing systems in Brussels turned away from its founder's missions and transparent obligations to the 25 countyries peoples who won it and the interactions with the world that policies like agriculture wave wealth or poverty depending on which farmers livelihoods you truly seek to sustain in a world where food's markets know no boundaries whatever politicians of a Canutian mentality believe. Nobody who is serious about practising Entrepreneurs' rights is likely to find any useful texts sponsored by EU research unless you can provide us with the bookmarks which we'll happily catalogue here: ...
BEYOND EUROPE
There are worlds of entrepreneurial opportunities, and what networks do is multiply their connections with ever greater speed. As web2.1 folk people spiralling out of California say: we ain't seen nothing yet. And if as parents we have little idea what the web can do other thah it will link many revolutions, how can we help our children given the only racing certainty that their wealth and happiness will be a web revolution away from the separations that the pre-web 20th Century powered over.
America led the scihi way (better than all the peoples of the earth could possibly have expecetd) right up to Intrapreneurial charters of the early 1980s, as it had up to that time with progessing science for humanity. Clearly something to do with the transparency of scientific learning and application started changing around that time, otherwise today's urgent appeal by clusters of Americans to love scihi again would not be propagating across the states with such urgency from west to east and south to north. Exploratory Americans may now find huge science entrepreneur learnings to gather from collaborating with Canada, itself a great gateway to India and Australia, whose community-up preneurship provides the greatest basis bouth sustainbiluity of science and sustainability of economics. Meanwhile China is a global puzzle in itself. Clearly its spirit is indomitable Is this because fashionable female citizens want scientist husbands more than any other charcteristic? Or is it because the expatriate Chinese are the 3rd richest cultural group on earth and very scientific in what they will actually invest in?. Or...?
How can the 80% of people who are not Chinese encourage the best of scientific revolutions whilst opening this up to all beings not a class of haves science and a class of have nots? Why would those who control China's investments not want to curb continent-wide use of google as the tool that enables more science to be explored than interacted than any yet known to me?
5 Which are the biggest revolutions inspiring peoples that computers have changed the world with. Do you have a shortlist? Do you know what crises of humanity mathematicians like Einstein and John von Neumann computing to be epicentral to? And how do the greeatest missin controls of humanity's future history depend on the immensity of inspiration and trust in governance of where these missions will lead their emerging industry sectors to globalise the greatest opportunities with the smallest risks. exponentials
For example, the race to get to the moon -how did KM work in that revolution. Peter Drucker expected many revolutions. Last Tuesday President Bush promised American children 2 revolutions: what us parents call scihi getting kids excidted about their futures and learning science; making the first 5 year revolution an end to society's addiction to being driven by petroleum economics. If anyone is working on the entrepreneurial newtorks needed in these areas- please cintact me:as a peoples entrepreneur, I am simply connecting people who are passionate about compiling an open catalogue of who's who. To begin with I have sent a letter asking each of the 20 US business leaders behind the President's revolutionary promises what web2.1 type contactivities they already know of linking in these 2 great colaborative invitations. Is Europe doing anything similar?
